The Circle. Since decades, most clueless accuse
economists to understand nothing. It is true that as in all professions, there
are charlatans, astrologers and those preferring what is
"fashionable" and mays "buzz" than demanding and often
unpopular objectivity. The others are
never listened
Everyday, we collect poisoned fruit of a state that no
longer plays its role and assumes more duties. The state is a crucial agent of
the company as all of society -including its institutions and its economy- who
suffers from the failure of a public sector which returns the monopoly in vital
areas of our economy. And to interfere in the life of companies, the wanting to
enact the "social" and to regulate the
economics, state no longer has the means to discharge its essential and
irreplaceable police, justice and security missions. Beyond the regrettable
fact that rising insecurity increases the risk, and therefore the cost of
economic activities, , the indictment of the authority concerned, the serious
consequences for the fuel of training of individuals and their ability to work.
yet while the Moscow trial ( 1935-196), caught some consequences, the Nobel
laureate Kenneth J;Arrow yet very sensitive to social issues and equal
opportunities said" " The socialist economy does neither democracy
nor individual freedom. I had the naive idea that in the absence of capitalist
class, there would be not interest in the operation of one class by another. It
had become clear that this vision was not likely. The mysterious failure was
the possibility that socialism, focusing the control of the economy in the
state apparatus rendered the authorization or even period it inevitable
[1]"
Another Nobel price, Milton Friedman, once said «What
is extraordinary with the economics law is that all it laws actually in a page,
but their simplicity has never been accepted by most people.[2]"
Finally, the professor James Bucchanan himself winner
of the Nobel prize in economics, opened the meeting of the Mont Pelerin Society
in Potsdam in October 1999 with these words:" "Anyone so little
educated and intelligent knows that the liberal doctrine lies in the belief
that it is primarily expending the domain of individual decisions that we
extend of the issues based on collective projects that can best advance the society
[3]"
French don’t like to
receive lessons especially coming from American Nobel prize. It would be right
to blame the Americans for holding secret the «recipes” for their economic
growth. But this is not the attitude they have in reality. The results of
economic science are known and moreover are common Knowledge. But this is because one persists in France to
be deaf to these fundamental teachings:
It is because in this blocked country they keep on willing to treat many
folders (Pension, education, health, social protection, employment etc…) under
the single collective angle that many of these files are now at an impasse.
It’s urgent to recall a few
founding principles of economic science that sophisticated models as well as
academic jargon -as well as the official
language of wood- tend to forget by treating
problems only with technical and specialized angle.
-Principle 1: Nobody spends
someone else’s money as carefully as his own. It’s easy thus to be generous
with other’s money while one tend to be rational with his own money.
Principle 2: The key of the
raising of the standard of living is to develop savings, capital, education and
technology training
Principle 3: In any
voluntary exchange when they have accurate information, the buyer and seller
are both winners; so an increase in trade between individuals, between croups
or between countries is beneficial to both parties.
Precept 4: Given the
universal reality of limited resources and unlimited asks, concurrency is a
universal fact that can’t be abolish by governmental decree. But competition
doesn’t exclude cooperation.
Principle 5: Since most
individuals aren’t self-sufficient and almost all natural resources must be
transformed to become usable, individuals – Workers, owners, capitalist,
entrepreneurs etc..- must work together in the aim to produce goods and
services of value. But the cooperation doesn’t exclude cooperation.
Principle 6: Differences of
talent, intelligence, knowledge and property lead to specialization and
comparative advantage for each individual, company or country. Wanting to do everything
is inefficient.
Principle 7: Information
about market‘s behavior is so diverse, important, changing and pervasive that
it’s can’t be fully understood and calculated by a central authority.
Principle 8: Profit and
loss are the market mechanisms that indicate what has or doesn’t have to be
product in the long term.
Principle 9: Do something
implies to renounce to other thing what you have liked to do too.
Principle 10: Prices are
determined by the subjective buyer estimation (request)and the subjective
seller estimation (offer),and not by any production objective cost.
Principle 11: It always
exists a dose of objective risk and uncertainty about the future, especially
when people are free to make choices, learn from their mistakes and change
their mind. What makes difficult any prediction on the future and any attempt
to failure, at least in a society of freedom.
Principle12: The increase
in wages on the long term can be achieved by greater productivity i.e more
capital investments for each worker, the chronic unemployment is a consequence
of the action of the government which sets the rate of pay above the market
clearing level.
Principle13: Controls on
prices, wages, and rents can’t benefit to society as a whole. In the end these
controls may create shortages, back market, a deterioration in the quality and
services. Free meals, that doesn’t exist…
Principle14: Deliberate
attempts to depreciate the currency or to artificially lower interest rates, or
to engage in easy money policies lead to inflation, cycles of
prosperity/recessing and economic crises.
The money is an expression
of wealth, it is not wealth.
Principle 15: The
government must stick to what private companies can’t do. It must not engage in
business that the private sector handles better than him or a fortiori, prevent companies from doing what they could
do at least as well as he ( enacting a
public monopoly, for example)…
The understanding of these
principles doesn’t imply to have a PHC in economics. Economics is interested in
how people organize, operate and evolve in society and how they reach others
objectives by mobilizing resources. The consumer doesn’t make this or that
decision because an expert proved it was optimal to do so, expert
–competent- concludes to this model
that allows him to predict this out because he has observed consumers to do so.
But our leaders are still
surrounded by experts considering that business located within the French
territory must behave according to their models and their political choices.
Hence the illusory claim to regulate the economy and format the society. May
the State restore the conditions of freedom , may the State ensure the
protection of human rights of property ( which is the liberty to dispose of the fruits of his work) , of
the freedom of movement and the freedom to work; may State cease interference in social and
economic and there will be economics
mechanisms to develop according to the precepts set out above.
1) [1] In Feiwel,
g.(ed )(1987), Arrow and the foundation of the theory of economic policy,
London, Macmillan.
2) [2] The full text of this speech was published in
summer 2000 in the Independent Review, quarterly magazine published by the
independent Institute of San Francisco.
3) [3] Idem
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire